--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:18:34 +0800 |
I use indent-region non-interactively and the progress report gets in
the way. So I propose make it possible to suppress it. Objections?
=== modified file 'lisp/indent.el'
--- lisp/indent.el 2013-10-17 19:31:11 +0000
+++ lisp/indent.el 2013-12-11 01:14:31 +0000
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
"Short cut function to indent region using `indent-according-to-mode'.
A value of nil means really run `indent-according-to-mode' on each line.")
-(defun indent-region (start end &optional column)
+(defun indent-region (start end &optional column nomsg)
"Indent each nonblank line in the region.
A numeric prefix argument specifies a column: indent each line to that column.
@@ -443,7 +443,8 @@
Called from a program, START and END specify the region to indent.
If the third argument COLUMN is an integer, it specifies the
-column to indent to; if it is nil, use one of the three methods above."
+column to indent to; if it is nil, use one of the three methods above.
+If NOMSG is non-nil, do not report progress."
(interactive "r\nP")
(cond
;; If a numeric prefix is given, indent to that column.
@@ -481,13 +482,14 @@
(save-excursion
(setq end (copy-marker end))
(goto-char start)
- (let ((pr (make-progress-reporter "Indenting region..." (point) end)))
- (while (< (point) end)
- (or (and (bolp) (eolp))
- (indent-according-to-mode))
+ (let ((pr (unless nomsg
+ (make-progress-reporter "Indenting region..." (point) end))))
+ (while (< (point) end)
+ (or (and (bolp) (eolp))
+ (indent-according-to-mode))
(forward-line 1)
- (progress-reporter-update pr (point)))
- (progress-reporter-done pr)
+ (and pr (progress-reporter-update pr (point))))
+ (and pr (progress-reporter-done pr))
(move-marker end nil)))))
;; In most cases, reindenting modifies the buffer, but it may also
;; leave it unmodified, in which case we have to deactivate the mark
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#16108: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:57:41 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.9) |
Fixed in 24.4
On 2013-12-13 02:34 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Let's first silence (unconditionally) the messages when in
> the minibuffer. We'll see later if messages still need to be silenced,
> and in which cases.
Sounds good.
Leo
--- End Message ---