[debbugs-tracker] bug#16135: closed (After backward-up-list in jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions, insert-parentheses malfunctions)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:53:32 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#16135: After backward-up-list in 
jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions,  insert-parentheses malfunctions
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16135,
regarding After backward-up-list in 
jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions,  insert-parentheses malfunctions
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
16135: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16135
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: After backward-up-list in jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions, insert-parentheses malfunctions Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:10:15 -0500

Let jit-lock-after-change.el have:

  (add-hook 'jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions
            (lambda (_start _end _old-len)
              (condition-case nil
                  (backward-up-list)
                (scan-error nil)))
            nil
            t)

Start today's trunk by:

  emacs -Q --load /tmp/jit-lock-after-change.el

Insert parentheses:

  M-(

Inserted into *scratch* buffer:

  ) (

But expected:

  ()

I'm on RHEL 5.

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#16135: After backward-up-list in jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions, insert-parentheses malfunctions Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 11:53:32 -0500

Right, I see my error.

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> wrote:

Barry OReilly wrote:

>   (add-hook 'jit-lock-after-change-extend-region-functions
>             (lambda (_start _end _old-len)
>               (condition-case nil
>                   (backward-up-list)
>                 (scan-error nil)))
>             nil
>             t)
[...]
> Insert parentheses:
>
>   M-(
>
> Inserted into *scratch* buffer:
>
>   ) (
>
> But expected:
>
>   ()

Well, it sounds like you shouldn't do that, then.

--- End Message ---