--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:21:19 -0800 (PST) |
See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.
I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this. But I
guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
effect.
In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
of 2013-11-28 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 115271 address@hidden
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
`configure --enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:01 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
> See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.
>
> I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this. But I
> guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
> do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
> effect.
Fixed in trunk, thanks.
--- End Message ---