emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#15995: closed (24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill':


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#15995: closed (24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:45:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:01 +0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize 
that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15995,
regarding 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must 
immediately precede the next kill
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
15995: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15995
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:21:19 -0800 (PST)
See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.

I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
effect.

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
 of 2013-11-28 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 115271 address@hidden
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
 `configure --enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:44:01 +0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:

> See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.
>
> I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this.  But I
> guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
> do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
> effect.

Fixed in trunk, thanks.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]