[debbugs-tracker] bug#13946: closed (24.3; [PATCH] fix of apropos with words)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:47:11 +0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#13946: 24.3; [PATCH] fix of apropos with words
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #13946,
regarding 24.3; [PATCH] fix of apropos with words
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
13946: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13946
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3; [PATCH] fix of apropos with words
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:21:29 +0900
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> `apropos' family with plural words returns unexpected symbols and are
> annoying.  It is because `apropos-words-to-regexp' doesn't work as
> documented/expected.
>
> The following is revised `apropos-words-to-regexp'.
>
>
> (defun apropos-words-to-regexp (words wild)
>   "Make regexp matching any two of the words in WORDS."
>   (if (null (cdr words))
>       (car words)
>     ;; assure all words are independent objects for delq
>     (setq words (mapcar 'copy-sequence words))
>     (mapconcat
>      (lambda (w)
>        (concat "\\(?:" w "\\)" ;; parens for synonyms
>                wild
>                "\\(?:"
>                (mapconcat
>                 'identity
>                 (delete-dups (delq w (copy-sequence words)))
>                 "\\|")
>                "\\)"))
>      (delete-dups (copy-sequence words))
>      "\\|")))
>
>
> results:
>
> (apropos-words-to-regexp '("A" "B") ".*?")
> "\\(?:A\\).*?\\(?:B\\)\\|\\(?:B\\).*?\\(?:A\\)"
>
> (apropos-words-to-regexp '("A" "B" "C") ".*?")
> "\\(?:A\\).*?\\(?:B\\|C\\)\\|\\(?:B\\).*?\\(?:A\\|C\\)\\|\\(?:C\\).*?\\(?:A\\|B\\)"
>
> (apropos-words-to-regexp '("A" "B" "B") ".*?")
> "\\(?:A\\).*?\\(?:B\\)\\|\\(?:B\\).*?\\(?:A\\|B\\)"
>
> (apropos-words-to-regexp '("A" "A" "B" "C" "C") ".*?")
> "\\(?:A\\).*?\\(?:A\\|B\\|C\\)\\|\\(?:B\\).*?\\(?:A\\|C\\)\\|\\(?:C\\).*?\\(?:A\\|B\\|C\\)"
>
>
>
> Additionally, in `apropos-parse-pattern', ".+" passed to
> `apropos-words-to-regexp' wolud be better if ".+?".
>
>
> Regards,
> Shigeru.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#13946: 24.3; [PATCH] fix of apropos with words
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:47:11 +0800
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Shigeru Fukaya <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > `apropos' family with plural words returns unexpected symbols and are
> > annoying.  It is because `apropos-words-to-regexp' doesn't work as
> > documented/expected.
> >
> > The following is revised `apropos-words-to-regexp'.
>
> Thanks, committed to trunk.
>
>
> --- End Message ---