[debbugs-tracker] bug#16228: closed (Error in 'diff3' man page)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:43:14 -0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#16228: Error in 'diff3' man page
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16228,
regarding Error in 'diff3' man page
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
16228: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16228
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Error in 'diff3' man page
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:41:45 +0000
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
>
>
>
>
> -- (This was originally posted to bug-gnu-utils as described here:
> --
> -- https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Bugs.html
> --
> -- )
>
> Most obsessive/pedantic/picky PR of the year goes to me, with:
>
> The man page for diff3(1) refers to 'info diff' instead of
> 'info diff3'
>
> >> How-To-Repeat:
>
> % man diff3
>
> Compare the similarity of the end of this page with the end of the
> 'man diff' page.
>
> Both refer to 'info diff' for more information, but if you compare
> the results of 'info diff' and 'info diff3' you'll clearly see that
> the man page for diff3 should be referencing 'info diff3'.
>
> Cheers, Jamie
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#16228: Error in 'diff3' man page
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:43:14 -0800
>
>
>
>
> tags 16228 notabug
> close 16228
> thanks
>
> As I mentioned on bug-gnu-utils, this appears not to be a problem
> when using a recent upstream release.
>
>
> --- End Message ---