[debbugs-tracker] bug#16461: closed (24.3.50; electric eats too much)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:47:10 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#16461: 24.3.50; electric eats too much
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16461,
regarding 24.3.50; electric eats too much
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
16461: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16461
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3.50; electric eats too much
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:51:47 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
>
>
> In Text mode typing RET on a formfeed character ^L deletes it.
> The presence of ^L means it's here on purpose, so RET should keep it.
>
> electric-indent-post-self-insert-function calls indent-according-to-mode
> that uses special casing for indent-relative (that is the default
> indent-line-function in text-mode).  I don't understand why it
> calls ^L-eating indent-line-to instead of indent-relative
> but without this special casing, indent-relative works fine
> and doesn't eat ^L.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#16461: 24.3.50; electric eats too much
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:47:10 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
>
>
> >>> But I also think that indent-line-to should *not* eat ^L.
> >> This patch fixes the problem and doesn't eat ^L:
> >
> > Looks OK, thanks.  This difference between back-to-indentation and
> > backward-to-indentation is really obscure.
>
> Perhaps a new function with more descriptive name could be added later.
>
>
> --- End Message ---