emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#16604: closed (24.3.50; False negatives in lisp-co


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#16604: closed (24.3.50; False negatives in lisp-completion-at-point)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:39:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 06 Feb 2014 03:38:22 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#16604: 24.3.50; False negatives in 
lisp-completion-at-point
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16604,
regarding 24.3.50; False negatives in lisp-completion-at-point
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
16604: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16604
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.3.50; False negatives in lisp-completion-at-point Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 06:46:01 +0200
Example:

(defmacro fizzle (&rest body)
  (declare (indent defun))
  `(let ((coooooooon 0))
     ,@body))

(defun fozzle ()
  (fizzle
    (foo co)))

1. Evaluate the macro.

2. Put point after "co" in fozzle, press C-M-i.

3. See it get automatically completed to "coooooooon", even though there
are many dynamic variables that start with "co".


In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.4 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.8.6)
 of 2014-01-23 on axl
Repository revision: 116128 address@hidden
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11405000
System Description:     Ubuntu 13.10



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#16604: 24.3.50; False negatives in lisp-completion-at-point Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 03:38:22 +0200 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
Version: 24.4

On 05.02.2014 15:53, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The suffix is not a problem.  But the prefix is, because with an empty
string, the boundary will always be zero.  And we can't disallow tables
that return an explicit 0 boundary.

True.

Please install, thank you,

Revision 116279.



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]