[debbugs-tracker] bug#14669: closed (24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:07:05 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#14669: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14669,
regarding 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
14669: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14669
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
>
> Backtrace:
> 0x011ecbac
> 0x011ecc1e
> 0x010d9fe0
> 0x01151719
> 0x01147b6b
> 0x011e4123
> 0x76a662f6
> 0x76a66d36
> 0x76a677c0
> 0x76a67886
> 0x011e251e
> 0x011e27bd
> 0x755133a6
> 0x77579eee
> 0x77579ec1
>
>
>
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
>  of 2013-06-17 on ODIEONE
> Bzr revision: 113024 address@hidden
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
> Configured using:
>  `configure --prefix=/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=yes,glyphs
>  CFLAGS=-O0 -g3 LDFLAGS=-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib
>  CPPFLAGS=-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include'
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#14669: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:07:05 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> > Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:11:27 -0800
> > MailScanner-NULL-Check: address@hidden
> > 
> > Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > >> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> > >> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:00:32 +0200
> > >> Cc: Drew Adams <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> > >> 
> > >>  form.rcArea.bottom = (WINDOW_BOTTOM_EDGE_Y (w)
> > >> - WINDOW_MODE_LINE_HEIGHT (w));
> > >> 
> > >> 3194 is the second of these lines.
> > >
> > > Thanks.  That's the other line that uses XBUFFER.
> > >
> > > I installed a more radical change in revision 113100, let's see if it
> > > solves the problem.
> > 
> > Did this fix solve this XBUFFER problem?  It's been half a year...
>
> This bug was fixed long ago, closing.
>
>
> --- End Message ---