[debbugs-tracker] bug#16660: closed (24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:27:07 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#16660: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16660,
regarding 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
16660: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16660
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:31:32 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>
>
>
> Backtrace:
> 011fb989
> 011fb9fa
> 010f003b
> 01161f9d
> 01009f22
> 0100a60f
> 01008963
> 010080f6
> 01007da0
> 010437c5
> 01041701
> 010f65f0
> 01103a81
> 010f4109
> 0117d091
> 010f3a3e
> 0117c63e
> 010f39a5
> 010f318c
> 010f3348
> 01180114
> 011c0d04
> 01180913
> 0118036d
> 0117f692
> 0117fbc7
> 0117a4b4
> 0117f1d9
> 0117a9a4
> 0117eb07
> 0117a72e
> 0117eb07
> 0117a9a4
> 0117c23a
> 0117eb07
> 0117a9a4
> 0116e47d
> 0117eb07
> 0117c892
> 0117eb07
> 0117a9a4
> 0117c13c
> 0117eb07
> 0117a9a4
> 0117eb07
> 0117a72e
> 0117eb07
> 0117a9a4
> 01180c42
> 01180440
> 0117f692
> 01180021
> 011c0d04
> 01180913
> 01180632
> 0117f010
> 0117a9a4
> 0117a7ec
> 0117eb07
> 0117a9a4
> 0117eb07
> 0117a72e
> ...
>
>
>
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32)
>  of 2014-02-02 on ODIEONE
> Bzr revision: 116242 address@hidden
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
> Configured using:
>  `configure --prefix=/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=yes,glyphs
>  'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' LDFLAGS=-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib
>  CPPFLAGS=-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include'
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#16660: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:27:07 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:14:19 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> > 
> > > I see this happened while Emacs was in debugger.  Is this
> > > reproducible?
> > 
> > Not by me, I'm afraid.
>
> Then I don't think we could do anything about this bug, sorry.
> Resolving it needs careful examination of data structures used by the
> display engine, to reveal what assumption (backed by the assertion
> that was violated here) went wrong, and why.
>
> Closing.
>
>
> --- End Message ---