emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#14394: closed (jit-lock-force-redisplay redefiniti


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#14394: closed (jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:45:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:44:34 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#14394: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks 
jit fontification in auctex
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14394,
regarding jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in 
auctex
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
14394: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14394
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:23:07 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

A commit of Stefan Monnier in April 23 changed the API of
jit-lock-force-redisplay. First and easiest, the docstring of
jit-lock-force-redisplay was not changed, and still mentions the old BUF
argument.

Second, this breaks function font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay in
auctex, which uses the old prototype. This is present in emacs and
auctex from trunk. Is the prototype change really necessary? If no, this
is a bug for emacs, if yes, this is a bug for auctex. In doubt, I'm
submitting the report in both.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#14394: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:44:34 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Version: 24.4

Antoine Levitt wrote:

> First and easiest, the docstring of jit-lock-force-redisplay was not
> changed, and still mentions the old BUF argument.

Fixed.

The remainder is an AUCTeX issue, and since you said you already mailed
them about it, no need to keep this Emacs bug report open.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]