|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#16505: closed (24.3.50; Emacs seems to lose key events when typing fast) |
Date: | Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:53:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:52:25 +0100 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#16505: Acknowledgement (24.3.50; Emacs seems to loose key events when typing fast (seriously)) has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #16505, regarding 24.3.50; Emacs seems to lose key events when typing fast to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 16505: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16505 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: 24.3.50; Emacs seems to loose key events when typing fast (seriously) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:25:15 +0100 When typing something fast like <down> <tab> repeated over and over again, Emacs seems to loose key events. This seems to work correctly on 23.3.Steps to repeat:emacs -QEvaluate:(progn (insert "(") (make-stringIn GNU Emacs 24.3.50.4 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0, NS apple-appkit-1265.00)of 2014-01-16 on macpro.lanRepository revision: 116039 address@hiddenWindowing system distributor `Apple', version 10.3.1265Configured using:`configure --with-ns'Important settings:value of $LC_CTYPE: UTF-8locale-coding-system: utf-8-unixMajor mode: Lisp InteractionMinor modes in effect:tooltip-mode: telectric-indent-mode: tmouse-wheel-mode: ttool-bar-mode: tmenu-bar-mode: tfile-name-shadow-mode: tglobal-font-lock-mode: tfont-lock-mode: tblink-cursor-mode: tauto-composition-mode: tauto-encryption-mode: tauto-compression-mode: tline-number-mode: ttransient-mark-mode: tRecent input:<escape> x r e p o <tab> r <tab> <return>Recent messages:For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a.Making completion list...Load-path shadows:None found.Features:(shadow sort gnus-util mail-extr emacsbug message format-spec rfc822 mmlmml-sec mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrevgmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-utilhelp-fns mail-prsvr mail-utils help-mode easymenu time-date tooltipelectric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel ns-wintool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcommentlisp-mode prog-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer selectscroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame chamgeorgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet laokorean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopicindian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simpleabbrev minibuffer nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp filestext-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mulecustom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-processcocoa ns multi-tty emacs)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#16505: Acknowledgement (24.3.50; Emacs seems to loose key events when typing fast (seriously)) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:52:25 +0100 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Anders Lindgren skrev 2014-02-16 08:42:Hi!Hello.I got some time to track down the problem. It appears as though the OS sometimes adds a spurious "key pad" flag to keys not on the key pad. The way the nsterm.m is implemented, it fails to look them up making the key dead. The following patch will first try to lookup the key as a keypad key, and if that fails, it will look it up as a plain key.Checked in, thanks. Jan D.I have talked to the author of the 110793 revision and he has confirmed that my patch works OK. Unfortunately, I don't have write access to the bzr archive, so I can't commit this myself. === modified file 'src/nsterm.m' --- src/nsterm.m2014-02-10 22:15:54 +0000 +++ src/nsterm.m2014-02-15 07:01:48 +0000 @@ -5119,9 +5119,17 @@ /* (Carbon way: [theEvent keyCode]) */ /* is it a "function key"? */ - fnKeysym = (code < 0x00ff && (flags&NSNumericPadKeyMask)) -? ns_convert_key ([theEvent keyCode] | NSNumericPadKeyMask) -: ns_convert_key (code); + /* Note: Sometimes a plain key will have the NSNumericPadKeyMask + flag set (this is probably a bug in the OS). + */ + if (code < 0x00ff && (flags&NSNumericPadKeyMask)) + { + fnKeysym = ns_convert_key ([theEvent keyCode] | NSNumericPadKeyMask); + } + if (fnKeysym == 0) + { + fnKeysym = ns_convert_key (code); + } if (fnKeysym) { Sincerely, Anders Lindgren On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Anders Lindgren <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote: Got it! It's revision 110793 -- this is a change to nsterm.m (hence an OS X-specific problem). The bzr log is as follows: revno: 110793 fixes bug: http://debbugs.gnu.org/8680 author: Michael Marchionna <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> committer: Chong Yidong <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> branch nick: trunk timestamp: Sun 2012-11-04 11:34:10 +0800 message: * nsterm.m: Add NSClearLineFunctionKey and keypad keys. (keyDown): Remap keypad keys to X11 virtual key codes. When looking at the code, it's unfortunately not obvious (to me) what the cause is... -- Anders On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote: > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 21:04:13 +0100 > From: Anders Lindgren <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> > Cc: Dmitry Antipov <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>, address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> > > By back-applying 111505 into earlier revisions I have concluded that 110812 > contains the problem. To ensure that the problem wasn't caused by 111505 > itself, I also applied it to 110785 (the last revision without this > problem) without introducing the "key dropped" problem. In other words, the > problem must have been introduced somewhere in the range 110796..110811. If that is the range, the only relevant commit seems to be 110802. > Unfortunately, I get a build error below for these revisions. The build > error is "not enough room for load commands for new __DATA segments", which > is issued from deep inside the "unexmacosx.c" module. I have no insight > into the "unexec" process, so this has stopped me from narrowing down the > problem further. > > Any suggestions on moving forward would be welcome -- for example, would it > be possible to run Emacs undumped, avoiding unexec all together? Try reverting only 110802.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |