--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Empty face settings ignored |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:14:23 -0500 |
Package: Emacs
Version: 24.3.50
Some recent change made Emacs ignore "empty" face settings:
src/emacs -Q lisp/minibuffer.el
M-x customize-face RET RET
click on the "Inherit" button so as to disable inheritance: the result
should be a face that does not specify any particular appearance.
Middle click "State => Set for current session"
and notice that the color is still the same.
-- Stefan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#16694: bugs #16694/#16378: Patches |
|
Date: |
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:52:54 +0300 |
> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:04:19 +0200
> From: Matthias Dahl <address@hidden>
> CC: Clemens Schüller
> <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>,
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> Like promised, attached revised versions of my first three patches which
> had a nasty and very embarrassing bug/brain-fart as well as a potential
> fix for bug #16434.
>
> I'd appreciate testing and any feedback, so that we (as in who ever is
> in charge and can do this) commit this for the pretest. :)
Thanks. I applied to the emacs-24 branch the first 2 patches, the
part of the 3rd patch that does not introduce backward
incompatibilities, and the 4th patch you sent in a later message.
Please confirm that the result will DTRT. Meanwhile, I'm marking
those bugs as "done".
In the future, please also provide ChangeLog entries for the changes
that could be dropped into the respective ChangeLog files. TIA.
The incompatible part of the 3rd patch, reproduced below, remains
uncommitted. I understand the motivation for it, but the emacs-24
branch shouldn't introduce incompatible changes at this time. If
Stefan agrees with applying this part to the trunk, I will do that.
============================================================
Backwards incompatible change: make-face previously accepted
no-init-from-resources as an optional parameter which has now
been removed. There were no other users within Emacs itself. And this
parameter shouldn't have been there in the first place, imho.
diff --git a/lisp/faces.el b/lisp/faces.el
index 8536c08..28205d2 100644
--- a/lisp/faces.el
+++ b/lisp/faces.el
@@ -149,13 +149,10 @@ REGISTRY, ALTERNATIVE1, ALTERNATIVE2, and etc."
"Return a list of all defined faces."
(mapcar #'car face-new-frame-defaults))
-(defun make-face (face &optional no-init-from-resources)
+(defun make-face (face)
"Define a new face with name FACE, a symbol.
Do not call this directly from Lisp code; use `defface' instead.
-
-If NO-INIT-FROM-RESOURCES is non-nil, don't initialize face
-attributes from X resources. If FACE is already known as a face,
-leave it unmodified. Return FACE."
+If FACE is already known as a face, leave it unmodified. Return FACE."
(interactive (list (read-from-minibuffer
"Make face: " nil nil t 'face-name-history)))
(unless (facep face)
@@ -166,8 +163,7 @@ leave it unmodified. Return FACE."
(when (fboundp 'facemenu-add-new-face)
(facemenu-add-new-face face))
;; Define frame-local faces for all frames from X resources.
- (unless no-init-from-resources
- (make-face-x-resource-internal face)))
+ (make-face-x-resource-internal face))
face)
(defun make-empty-face (face)
@@ -175,7 +171,7 @@ leave it unmodified. Return FACE."
Do not call this directly from Lisp code; use `defface' instead."
(interactive (list (read-from-minibuffer
"Make empty face: " nil nil t 'face-name-history)))
- (make-face face 'no-init-from-resources))
+ (make-face face))
(defun copy-face (old-face new-face &optional frame new-frame)
"Define a face named NEW-FACE, which is a copy of OLD-FACE.
--- End Message ---