[debbugs-tracker] bug#17498: closed (24.4.50; This function has a compiler macro `yes--cmacro'.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 May 2014 02:25:57 +0800
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#17498: 24.4.50; This function has a compiler macro 
`yes--cmacro'.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17498,
regarding 24.4.50; This function has a compiler macro `yes--cmacro'.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
17498: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17498
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.4.50; This function has a compiler macro `yes--cmacro'.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 15 May 2014 23:05:18 +0800
>
>
>
>
> Eval the following code
>
> ;;;; BEGIN
> (defun yes ()
>   )
> (when nil
>   (cl-define-compiler-macro yes (&rest _)))
> ;;;; END
>
> ,----[ C-h f yes RET ]
> | yes is a Lisp function.
> | 
> | (yes)
> | 
> | This function has a compiler macro `yes--cmacro'.
> | 
> | Not documented.
> | 
> | [back]
> `----
>
> how is it possible? the compiler macro is defined at macro expansion
> time?
>
> Leo
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#17498: 24.4.50; This function has a compiler macro `yes--cmacro'.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 17 May 2014 02:25:57 +0800
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (CentOS 6.5)
>
>
>
>
> On 2014-05-16 08:24 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Well, there's always some other way, but yes it's made so that it works
> > when byte-compiling.
>
> OK and thanks for the explanation. It took me by a surprise.
>
> Leo
>
>
> --- End Message ---