[debbugs-tracker] bug#17664: closed (Solaris acl woes)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17664,
regarding Solaris acl woes
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
17664: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17664
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: Solaris acl woes
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
>
>
>
>
> Ben Walton wrote:
>
> > The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is:
>
> Why is it returning 1, exactly?  What are the value of access_masks[0, 
> 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that 
> shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Fwd: Re: Solaris acl woes
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:44:57 -0700
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
>
>
>
>
> [Forwarding this to Bug#17669 as bug-coreutils seems to have misfiled it 
> under 17664; closing 17664.]
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:        Re: Solaris acl woes
> Date:   Mon, 02 Jun 2014 06:56:03 -0700
> From:   Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Organization:   UCLA Computer Science Department
> To: 	Ben Walton <address@hidden>, address@hidden, 
> address@hidden
>
>
>
> Ben Walton wrote:
>
> > The lib/file-has-acl.c:acl_ace_nontrivial code that returns 1 is:
>
> Why is it returning 1, exactly?  What are the value of access_masks[0,
> 1] and how do they compare to the masks, and what bits are set that
> shouldn't be if we want the ACLs to be trivial?
>
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---