[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[debbugs-tracker] Processed (with 6 errors): Re: bug#17765: julian date
From: |
GNU bug tracker automated control server |
Subject: |
[debbugs-tracker] Processed (with 6 errors): Re: bug#17765: julian date is not what you think |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:04:02 -0400 |
Processing commands for address@hidden:
> On 06/12/2014 10:56 AM, Steve Zornes wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > the date command uses %j to specify number of days since beginning of year.
> > It looks as though %j is meant to mean Julian day which is ACTUALLY the
> > number of days since the julian calendar started. Currently 2,000,000 or so.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > number of days since the beginning of the year is called ordinal date and
> > should be specified with a %o
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > just a thought.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> >
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Too many unknown commands, stopping here.
No commands successfully parsed; sending the help text(s).
Sending instructions for address@hidden in separate message.
Please contact address@hidden if you need assistance.
GNU bugs database, http://debbugs.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [debbugs-tracker] Processed (with 6 errors): Re: bug#17765: julian date is not what you think,
GNU bug tracker automated control server <=