[debbugs-tracker] bug#18495: closed ([PATCH] Fix SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:42:49 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#18495: Alternatives!?!
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #18495,
regarding [PATCH] Fix SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
18495: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18495
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] Fix SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:32:35 +0200
>
>
>
>
> * libguile/smob.h (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC): This elementary API macro has
>   been broken by commit 56164dc47f6616b359f0ad23be208f01a77b55fa in 2009
>
> Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> ---
>  libguile/smob.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libguile/smob.h b/libguile/smob.h
> index 60abe37..e787cb1 100644
> --- a/libguile/smob.h
> +++ b/libguile/smob.h
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ scm_new_double_smob (scm_t_bits tc, scm_t_bits data1,
>  
>  #define SCM_SMOB_OBJECT(x)             (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1 (x))
>  #define SCM_SET_SMOB_OBJECT(x,obj)     (SCM_SET_SMOB_OBJECT_1 ((x), (obj)))
> -#define SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC(x)         (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC (x)))
> +#define SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC(x)         (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC (x))
>  
>  
>  #define SCM_SMOB_APPLY_0(x)            (scm_call_0 (x))
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#18495: Alternatives!?!
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:42:49 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > * libguile/smob.h (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_0_LOC)
> >   (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_2_LOC)
> >   (SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_3_LOC):  These elementary API macros have been broken
> >   by commit 56164dc47f6616b359f0ad23be208f01a77b55fa in 2009
>
> Ouch.  I've pushed this to stable-2.0, commit
> 8442211ef0029581b35f784489afcf210491fc41.  I'm closing this bug.
>
> > will there be something like an official guarantee that using
> > the undocumented SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_N_LOC will be supported for several
> > years?
>
> I think that's the best option.  Just use SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_N_LOC.
>
>      Mark
>
>
> --- End Message ---