|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#18656: closed (25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....)) |
Date: | Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:42:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:41:35 +0800 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#18656: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....) has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #18656, regarding 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....) to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 18656: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18656 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:32:24 +0800 BUFFER is actually a required argument. Shouldn't the lambda-list be written as: (defun temp-buffer-window-show (buffer &optional action) .....) Leo
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#18656: 25.0.50; (defun temp-buffer-window-show (&optional buffer action) ....) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:41:35 +0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (CentOS 6.5) version: 25.1 On 2014-10-10 11:03 +0200, martin rudalics wrote: > Yes. Please do that. > > Thanks, martin Done. Leo
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |