[debbugs-tracker] bug#19695: closed (24.4; python.el: [RFE] add customization option for send-main )

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:23:30 -0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line 24.4; python.el: [RFE] add customization option for send-main 
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19695,
regarding 24.4; python.el: [RFE] add customization option for send-main 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
19695: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19695
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.4; python.el: [RFE] add customization option for send-main 
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:18:38 -0300
>
>
>
>
> The send buffer behavior doesn't quite follows the principle of least
> surprise as currently implemented: one would expect that the
> if-name-main part will be executed the same everything else is. While I
> agree this is a matter of taste, I think it would be nice to add a
> global customization option for people that prefer the standard "execute
> all" behavior as a default.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Carlos
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.4; python.el: [RFE] add customization option for send-main 
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:23:30 -0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I agree that the least surprising thing to do would be to send the
> "if-name-main" block, but in the other hand this block generally
> contains the execution code for the module and when working on it you
> generally don't want to send that to the shell (one of the reasons may
> be safety).  So I think the current way of enabling this by just adding
> a prefix argument to `python-shell-send*` commands is better than adding
> yet another customization.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Fabián
>
>
> --- End Message ---