emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#20898: closed (25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#20898: closed (25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa)
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:44:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:43:39 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#20898: 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #20898,
regarding 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
20898: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20898
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:42:38 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
A bit of searching shows that landmark.el is not used much (if at all),
and in fact causes confusion :
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-04/msg00294.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-06/msg00592.html

In that thread, Stefan suggests to move landmark.el to GNU elpa. I want
to give this a try. What's the procedure ?

My current plan is :
- move the file to lisp/obsolete/,
- add a note to lisp/obsolete/landmark.el that it moved to GNU Elpa
  (like what was done for crisp.el)
- mention these changes in ChangeLog and NEWS
- copy the file to elpa.git, as packages/landmark/landmark.el
- add a Maintainer header (who should that be ? the original author ?)
and that's about it.

Opinions and advices very welcome.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#20898: 25.0.50; Move landmark.el to elpa Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:43:39 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Finally marking as done. Sorry for the long delay.

Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
> Nicolas Richard wrote:
>> - add a Maintainer header (who should that be ? the original author ?)
> I think the honest answer is that it has no maintainer.
> I'd either leave it with no Maintainer header (which by convention means
> the author), or add one that says help wanted.

Since the requirement for ELPA is to have such a header, I went for the
second option.

Nicolas.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]