|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#20837: closed (Code for --color=auto) |
Date: | Sun, 19 Jul 2015 00:14:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jul 2015 17:13:38 -0700 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: Code for --color=auto has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #20837, regarding Code for --color=auto to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 20837: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20837 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Code for --color=auto Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 07:08:23 -0700 Hello - I have my own C program where I also use SGR to produce color just like grep does. I pulled the grep source (2.21) to see how —color=auto was implemented. In grep.c, lines 2440-2441, there is the code: if (color_option == 2) color_option = isatty (STDOUT_FILENO) && should_colorize (); The thing about using isatty() is that it doesn’t work for the common case of piping the output of grep to less. What about using fstat(STDOUT_FILENO) instead? From testing (where “C” is an C program that outputs color using SGR), I’ve gotten: COMMAND Should? isatty ISCHR ISFIFO ISREG ======== ======= ====== ===== ====== ===== C T T T F F C > file F F F F >>T<<---- The interesting case. C | less T F F T F Hence, it would seem that we want to output color except when ISREG on the stat struct on stdout is T. Wouldn’t this make better logic for —color=auto ? - Paul
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: Code for --color=auto Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 17:13:38 -0700 This one's an easy call: the current behavior for --color=auto was designed to work the way it does, for the reasons Eric explained. Closing the bug report, as it's not a bug. User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |