emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#21429: closed (24.5; More robust test for calls to


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#21429: closed (24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file)
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:15:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:14:35 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#21429: 24.5; More robust test for calls to 
`package-initialize' in init file
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21429,
regarding 24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
21429: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21429
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 02:26:26 +1200 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
The code which checks the user's init file for calls to
`package-initialize' doesn't take the optional argument to
that function into account.

Attachment: 0001-More-robust-check-for-package-initialize-calls-in-in.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#21429: 24.5; More robust test for calls to `package-initialize' in init file Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:14:35 +0100
Pushed.
Thanks again.

2015-09-08 2:08 GMT+01:00 Phil Sainty <address@hidden>:
> On 2015-09-08 08:34, Artur Malabarba wrote:
>>
>> Have you done the copyright paperwork?
>
>
> Yes.
>


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]