emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#21502: closed ('shred' -NUMBER not recognised)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#21502: closed ('shred' -NUMBER not recognised)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:41:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:40:40 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#21502: 'shred' -NUMBER not recognised
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21502,
regarding 'shred' -NUMBER not recognised
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
21502: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21502
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 'shred' -NUMBER not recognised Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:23:17 +0000 (UTC)
Ostensible discrepancy between 'shred' and its documentation.
(shred (GNU coreutils) 8.23 on Xubuntu 14.10)

On the 'shred' info page:

‘-NUMBER’
‘-n NUMBER’
‘--iterations=NUMBER’
     By default, ‘shred’ uses 3 passes of overwrite.  You can reduce
     this to save time, or increase it if you think it’s appropriate.
     After 25 passes all of the internal overwrite patterns will have
     been used at least once.


If I try the '-NUMBER' method to specify number of iterations:

$ shred -1 file
shred: invalid option -- '1'
Try 'shred --help' for more information.

The other two methods for specifying number of iterations work.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#21502: 'shred' -NUMBER not recognised Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:40:40 -0700 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Thanks for reporting that -- it has been a bug in the manual for sixteen years! I installed the attached patch.

Attachment: 0001-shred-don-t-document-NUMBER-option.patch
Description: Text document


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]