emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#22390: closed (Spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#22390: closed (Spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el)
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:42:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:40:22 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#22390: Spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #22390,
regarding Spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
22390: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22390
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:47:05 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50
Hi all,

please consider the following scenario with Reftex enabled:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass{article}

\begin{document}
`C-( foo RET' enters \label{sec:foo} and again `C-( foo RET'.
\end{document}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Emacs 24.5 works just fine, but the latest Emacs from emacs-25 branch
raises an error:

Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument arrayp (format-message "Label `%s' exists. Use 
anyway? " label))

I tracked it down to a spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el.  Attached
patch is against emacs-25.  Any comments?

Best, Arash

Attachment: 0001-Delete-a-spurious-backquote.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#22390: Spurious backquote in reftex-ref.el Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:40:22 +0100
Hi Arash,

2016-01-24 10:28 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati <address@hidden>:
> Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Thanks for the patch, the spurious backquote has been introduces a few
>>> months ago, within what I guess was a massive search-and-replace
>>> change.  I hope there weren't other such errors.
>>>
>>> Tassilo, could you please install the patch?
>>
>> I'll do!
>
> Thanks for checking and installing.  I think the bug is still marked
> open on debbugs; do you want to close it?

Yes, it can be closed.

Bye,
Mosè


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]