emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#23442: closed ([PATCH] maint: avoid new warning fr


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#23442: closed ([PATCH] maint: avoid new warning from gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160503 (experimental))
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 15:18:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2016 08:17:18 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#23442: [PATCH] maint: avoid new warning from gcc (GCC) 
7.0.0 20160503 (experimental)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23442,
regarding [PATCH] maint: avoid new warning from gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160503 
(experimental)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
23442: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23442
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] maint: avoid new warning from gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160503 (experimental) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 20:59:32 -0700
coreutils failed to build when configured with --enable-gcc-warnings
and the latest gcc built from git.

Here's a patch to fix that:

Attachment: 0001-maint-avoid-new-warning-from-gcc-GCC-7.0.0-20160503-.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#23442: [PATCH] maint: avoid new warning from gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160503 (experimental) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 08:17:18 -0700
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Bernhard Voelker
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 05:08 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH] maint: avoid new warning from gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160503
>>  (experimental)
>>
>> * src/id.c (main): When configured with --enable-gcc-warnings and using
>> the very latest gcc built from git, building would fail with this:
>>   src/id.c:200:8: error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when \
>>     simplifying conditional to constant [-Werror=strict-overflow]
>>      bool default_format = (just_user + just_group + just_group_list
>>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Rewrite to use bool-appropriate operators.
>
> Thanks, that looks much cleaner.

Thanks again. Pushed and closed.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]