[debbugs-tracker] bug#23631: closed (25.0.94; Directories in completion-ignored-extensions not ignored)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 16:53:25 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#23631: 25.0.94; Directories in 
completion-ignored-extensions not ignored
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23631,
regarding 25.0.94; Directories in completion-ignored-extensions not ignored
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
23631: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23631
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 25.0.94; Directories in completion-ignored-extensions not ignored
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 27 May 2016 15:32:07 +0300
>
>
>
>
> Evaluate something like
>
> (file-name-all-completions "" "~/.emacs.d/")
>
> On my machine, this returns a list which includes ".git/". It should
> not, however, because ".git/" is in completion-ignored-extensions.
>
> Not 100% sure it's supposed to work, because it seems broken at least
> since 24.2 (maybe longer).
>
> in GNU Emacs 25.0.94.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.18.9)
>  of 2016-05-25 built on axl
> Repository revision: 897fb6fa49d5ffc85f0a796e7414a43ef05ad096
> Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11803000
> System Description:     Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#23631: 25.0.94; Directories in completion-ignored-extensions not ignored
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 27 May 2016 16:53:25 +0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2
>
>
>
>
> On 05/27/2016 04:11 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > This works as designed: completion-ignored-extensions only affects
> > file-name-completion, but not file-name-all-completions.  I've just
> > pushed a fix for the doc string of file-name-all-completions.
>
> I see, thanks!
>
> > (The
> > ELisp manual correctly says that the variable has no effect in your
> > case.)
>
> That kind of illustrates the problem of divergence between different 
> kinds of documentation.
>
>
> --- End Message ---