[debbugs-tracker] bug#24258: closed (25.1.50: In C++ `for' statement, second declaration is misfontified.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:04:05 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#24258: 25.1.50: In C++ `for' statement, second 
declaration is misfontified.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24258,
regarding 25.1.50: In C++ `for' statement, second declaration is misfontified.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
24258: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24258
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 25.1.50: In C++ `for' statement, second declaration is misfontified.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:04:15 +0000
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
>
>
>
>
> Hello, Emacs.
>
> In C++ Mode, in the following:
>
>     for (int32 a = 0, int32 b = 0; ; ) {
>     }
>
> , the second "int32" is getting font-lock-variable-name-face and "b" is
> left unfontified.  This is a bug.
>
> This was reported by Arash <address@hidden>.
>
> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#24258: 25.1.50: In C++ `for' statement, second declaration is misfontified.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:04:05 +0000
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
>
>
>
>
> tags 24258 notabug
> quit
>
> Hello, Arash.
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:13:36PM +0430, Arash wrote:
> > Oops lol, Sorry!
>
> No problem!
>
> > I was thinking of where else could something like
> > bug#24246 happen, I stopped thinking too early..
>
> Thanks!  That's always a good thing to do with a bug.
>
> And I learned something about for statements.
>
> I'm closing this now as it's "not a bug".
>
> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
>
>
> --- End Message ---