emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#12484: closed (bytecode.c compilation problem with


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#12484: closed (bytecode.c compilation problem with old gcc)
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:30:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:29:42 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12484: bytecode.c compilation problem with old gcc
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12484,
regarding bytecode.c compilation problem with old gcc
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12484: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12484
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: bytecode.c compilation problem with old gcc Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:56:00 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
On an old machine with:

$ gcc --version
2.96

bytecode.c does not compile:


gcc   -g3 -O2 /home/dann/hack/emacs/Emacs-CVS/emacs/src/bytecode.c
emacs/src/bytecode.c: In function `exec_byte_code':
emacs/src/bytecode.c:672: duplicate array index in initializer
emacs/src/bytecode.c:672: (near initialization for `targets')
emacs/src/bytecode.c:672: warning: excess elements in array initializer
emacs/src/bytecode.c:672: warning: (near initialization for `targets')
emacs/src/bytecode.c:672: duplicate array index in initializer


Disabling BYTE_CODE_THREADED makes it work.

Maybe the #if that enables BYTE_CODE_THREADED needs to be refined a bit.




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#12484: bytecode.c compilation problem with old gcc Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:29:42 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
Dan Nicolaescu wrote:

> On an old machine with:
>
> $ gcc --version
> 2.96
>
> bytecode.c does not compile:

gcc 2.96 was obsolete when this report was new.
4 years on, it's really really obsolete.
Given the lack of interest in this report, I think it is now time to
close it as wontfix.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]