|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#21039: closed (shell-command - bug and workaround.) |
Date: | Wed, 07 Dec 2016 20:02:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:01:11 -0500 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#21039: shell-command - bug and workaround. has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #21039, regarding shell-command - bug and workaround. to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 21039: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21039 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: shell-command - bug and workaround. Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 00:01:09 +0300 Hi! Please allow me to refer to my bug report I posted to SBCL bug database: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbcl/+bug/1470500
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#21039: shell-command - bug and workaround. Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:01:11 -0500 User-agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Eli Zaretskii wrote: > FWIW, I've read that SBCL bug report, and it involves 2 pieces of > software none of which are part of Emacs -- the SBCL binary and SLIME. > It could well be due to a bug in either one of these, or both, not in > Emacs. Someone who responded to the bug report claimed that they see > the same problem in Emacs without SLIME and SBCL, but provided no > details. > > So I guess we'd like to see a similar problem that involves neither > SBCL nor SLIME, and we'd like a recipe for that starting with "emacs -Q", > indeed. No response in over a year, closing.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |