--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
gnu tools conform to ?? older posix? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2016 01:39:42 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird |
In the 8.26 NEWS file, I found this paragraph:
These programs are intended to conform to POSIX (with BSD and other
extensions), like the rest of the GNU system. By default they conform
to older POSIX (1003.2-1992), and therefore support obsolete usages
like "head -10" and "chown owner.group file". This default is
overridden at build-time by ... and in turn can be overridden
at runtime ...
----
I don't think the above is correct w/r/t "rm" with its previous
functionality removed to enforce compliance with the latest POSIX
(not the 1992 POSIX).
I'm pretty sure that the 1992 version of POSIX didn't override
the historical design and behavior of "rm" by disabling
the "depth-first" removal of files if you specified "DIRNAME/.",
and generating an error message at the end (suppressible with
the "-f" switch).
As GNU utils strive for compliance w/the older POSIX standard,
I would like for rm's functionality to be restored.
In order to make it more useful, I ask that the --one-file-system
switch have a short-form, "-x", to indicate negation of crossing
file-system boundaries.
Thanks & Cheers!
:-) Linda
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#25259: gnu tools conform to ?? older posix? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:05:39 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
L. A. Walsh wrote:
I don't think the above is correct w/r/t "rm" with its previous
functionality removed to enforce compliance with the latest POSIX
(not the 1992 POSIX).
Yes, that part of README is obsolete. I installed the attached to fix that and
am closing this bug report. Although my impression is that you also want 'rm' to
be changed, that would be a topic for a different bug report.
0001-doc-Update-POSIX-part-of-README-Bug-25259.patch
Description: Text Data
--- End Message ---