[debbugs-tracker] bug#26588: closed (Add some (non-free?) font licenses.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 21:37:27 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26588,
regarding Add some (non-free?) font licenses.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
26588: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26588
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Add some (non-free?) font licenses.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:46:27 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
>
>
>
>
> The first patch adds Bitstream Vera license, which IMHO is non-free.
> Feel free to discuss it though, I'm not sure of the comment I wrote.
>
> The font could be added even though it is non-free because it could be
> considered a "Non-fonctional data".  See
> https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html#non-functional-data.
>
> The second patch adds Arev license, which is almost like Bitsteam Vera,
> and is needed by 0ad-data (which I'm working on).
>
> The third patch fixes font-bitstream-vera, which IMHO erroneously had
> X11-style license.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#26588: [PATCH 1/3] licenses: Add Bitstream Vera.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 01 May 2017 21:37:27 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1
>
>
>
>
> >> Ok!  Here are two patches: one adds fsdg-compatible, and the other
> >> updates the font package.  I'll also send the 0ad update to the 0ad
> >> debbugs thread.
> >
> > Thanks! These patches LGTM.
>
> I pushed them.  Thank you for the review :-)
>
>
> --- End Message ---