--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2017 00:45:34 +0900 |
I slightly changed the paragraph order in the documentation to (split-string)
to make it more readable.
Jean-Christophe
===========================
Improve documentation of (split-string)
* /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string): change paragraph
order to improve readability.
===========================
strings.texi.diff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2017 14:47:53 +0300 |
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 00:45:34 +0900
>
> I slightly changed the paragraph order in the documentation to (split-string)
> to make it more readable.
>
> Jean-Christophe
>
> ===========================
> Improve documentation of (split-string)
>
> * /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string): change paragraph
> order to improve readability.
> ===========================
Thanks, pushed.
One nit: please don't refer to functions with syntax that looks like a
function call, as in (split-string) above, or foo() for C sources.
The GNU Coding Standards frown on such references, because they look
like a call to a function with no arguments, which is not what is
meant there. We use 'split-string' and 'foo' instead, i.e. the name
of the function in quotes.
--- End Message ---