emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#27434: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add mkvtoolnix.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#27434: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add mkvtoolnix.)
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:46:03 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:45:46 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#27434] [PATCH] gnu: Add mkvtoolnix.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #27434,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Add mkvtoolnix.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
27434: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27434
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add mkvtoolnix. Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:54:33 +0200 User-agent: NeoMutt/20170602 (1.8.3)
Hello everybody,

I have packed mkvtoolnix along with some dependencies.

Best,
Gregor

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-mkvtoolnix.patch
Description: Text document


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#27434] [PATCH] gnu: Add mkvtoolnix. Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:45:46 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 05:43:31PM +0200, Gregor Giesen wrote:
> Dear Leo,
> 
> I had another look at those libraries:
> 
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:44:01AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > I noticed it includes some files in 'lib/', and at least some of them
> > appear to be bundled copies of 3rd-party libraries:
> >
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo 194 May 20 13:25 libebml       -> libebml
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo 236 May 20 13:25 libmatroska   -> libmatroska
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo  70 May 20 13:25 nlohmann-json -> nlohmann-json-cpp
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo  26 May 20 13:25 pugixml       -> pugixml
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo  18 May 20 13:25 utf8-cpp      -> utfcpp
> those can be removed, they are already included in ‘inputs’ and the 
> configure script favours the system (guix) lib over them.
> 
> The remaining three libraries are referenced directly from the source
> code. Here are comments from README.md:
> 
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo  66 May 20 13:25 boost
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> A class, `utf8_codecvt_facet`, derived from `std::codecvt<wchar_t, char>`,
> which can be used to convert utf8 data in files into `wchar_t` strings
> in the application.
> 
>   * License: Boost Software License - Version 1.0 (see 
> `doc/licenses/Boost-1.0.txt`)
>   * URL: http://www.boost.org
> --8<---------------cut here----------------end-------------->8---
> 
> The other two are some ancient and orphaned libraries for deprecated
> video formats, however GPLv2/LGPLv2.1:
> 
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo 116 May 20 13:25 avilib-0.6.10
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> Reading and writing avi files.
> 
> Copyright (C) 1999 Rainer Johanni <address@hidden>, originally part
> of the transcode package.
> 
>   * License: GNU General Public License v2
>   * URL: http://www.transcoding.org/
> 
> > drwxr-xr-x 1 leo leo 120 May 20 13:25 librmff
> librmff is short for 'RealMedia file format access library'. It aims
> at providing the programmer an easy way to read and write RealMedia
> files.
> 
>   * License: GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 (see 
> `doc/licenses/LGPL-2.1.txt`)
>   * URL: https://www.bunkus.org/videotools/librmff/index.html
> --8<---------------cut here----------------end-------------->8---
> 
> Is it ok to just include them and adding those two licenses the package?

Thank you very much for investigating, and I'm sorry my response was
rather slow! I just pushed revisions of your patches, based on our
discussion, as 2973ebf504f4d958a8db40b09b210b237060fc92.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]