emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#29082: closed (Guix-daemon has undefined reference


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#29082: closed (Guix-daemon has undefined reference to boost)
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 15:37:01 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:36:42 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#29082: Guix-daemon has undefined reference to boost
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #29082,
regarding Guix-daemon has undefined reference to boost
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
29082: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29082
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Guix-daemon has undefined reference to boost Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:40:46 +0100 User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Hello,

I am currently trying to compile the most recent guix on debian on a novena
arm board. First, I updated via git from release 0.12 to 0.13, then I used
this to do a "guix pull" yesterday:
$ guix --version
guix (GNU Guix) 20171030.19

Then I updated all the packages in my profile using this guix version.

When configuring and making guix from git checkout 
56295c51609c07e287ae1c23adc2536bb3c8c3c0,
linking the guix daemon leads to the following error:

make[2]: Entering directory '/home/andreas/guix'
  CXXLD    guix-daemon
nix/nix-daemon/guix_daemon-nix-daemon.o: In function 
`nix::FormatOrString::FormatOrString(boost::basic_format const&)':
/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
nix/nix-daemon/guix_daemon-nix-daemon.o: In function `acceptConnection':
/home/andreas/guix/nix/nix-daemon/nix-daemon.cc:888: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::basic_format(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, 
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)'
nix/nix-daemon/guix_daemon-nix-daemon.o: In function 
`nix::FormatOrString::FormatOrString(boost::basic_format const&)':
/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
`boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
nix/nix-daemon/guix_daemon-guix-daemon.o:/home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36:
 more undefined references to `boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const' 
follow
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

The same happens when I run "make" inside "guix environment guix"
(however, I did not reconfigure, since I would then have to wait
another hour or two to reach this point).

What is surprising is that "guix pull" succeeded, apparently with the
same code.

Andreas




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#29082: Guix-daemon has undefined reference to boost Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:36:42 +0100 User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:29:23PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
> >   CXXLD    guix-daemon
> > nix/nix-daemon/guix_daemon-nix-daemon.o: In function 
> > `nix::FormatOrString::FormatOrString(boost::basic_format const&)':
> > /home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
> > `boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
> > /home/andreas/guix/./nix/libutil/types.hh:36: undefined reference to 
> > `boost::basic_format::str[abi:cxx11]() const'
> I’m quite confident this is due to stale .o files or similar.
> Could you try removing all .o and .a files as well as ‘guix-register’
> and ‘guix-daemon’, and run ‘make’ again?

Indeed, you were right. Due to an error in my regular expression I removed
too many files and started from scratch with a fresh git clone, and things
went through.

Sorry for the noise, and thanks a lot for your advice!

Andreas



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]