emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#29138: closed (ediff-wind doc "are is")


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#29138: closed (ediff-wind doc "are is")
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 19:15:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:14:03 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#29138: ediff-wind doc "are is"
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #29138,
regarding ediff-wind doc "are is"
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
29138: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29138
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: ediff-wind doc "are is" Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 00:57:26 +0800
Hi,

In the document of ediff-setup-windows-multiframe-merge in ediff-wind.el, it used "are is" which I think it should be "are".


index ce95d42..79ccc6d 100644
--- "b/c:\\Users\\gitemacs\\emacs\\lisp\\vc\\ediff-wind.el"
+++ "a/c:\\Users\\Desktop\\ediff-wind.el"
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ into icons, regardless of the window manager."
   ;;   3. If C's frame is non-existent, then: if the first suitable
   ;;      non-dedicated frame  is different from A&B's, then use it for C.
   ;;      Otherwise, put A,B, and C in one frame.
-  ;;   4. If buffers A, B, C are is separate frames, use them to display these
+  ;;   4. If buffers A, B, C are separate frames, use them to display these
   ;;      buffers.
 
   ;;   Skip dedicated or iconified frames.

Attachment: ediff-wind.diff
Description: Text document


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#29138: ediff-wind doc "are is" Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:14:03 +0200
> From: Shuguang Sun <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 00:57:26 +0800
> 
> In the document of ediff-setup-windows-multiframe-merge in ediff-wind.el, it 
> used "are is" which I think it
> should be "are".

It should be "are in".

Thanks, I fixed this and some other typos in that commentary.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]