|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#29138: closed (ediff-wind doc "are is") |
Date: | Fri, 03 Nov 2017 19:15:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:14:03 +0200 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#29138: ediff-wind doc "are is" has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #29138, regarding ediff-wind doc "are is" to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 29138: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29138 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: ediff-wind doc "are is" Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 00:57:26 +0800 Hi,In the document of ediff-setup-windows-multiframe-merge in ediff-wind.el, it used "are is" which I think it should be "are".index ce95d42..79ccc6d 100644
--- "b/c:\\Users\\gitemacs\\emacs\\lisp\\vc\\ediff-wind.el"
+++ "a/c:\\Users\\Desktop\\ediff-wind.el"
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ into icons, regardless of the window manager."
;; 3. If C's frame is non-existent, then: if the first suitable
;; non-dedicated frame is different from A&B's, then use it for C.
;; Otherwise, put A,B, and C in one frame.
- ;; 4. If buffers A, B, C are is separate frames, use them to display these
+ ;; 4. If buffers A, B, C are separate frames, use them to display these
;; buffers.
;; Skip dedicated or iconified frames.ediff-wind.diff
Description: Text document
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#29138: ediff-wind doc "are is" Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:14:03 +0200 > From: Shuguang Sun <address@hidden> > Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 00:57:26 +0800 > > In the document of ediff-setup-windows-multiframe-merge in ediff-wind.el, it > used "are is" which I think it > should be "are". It should be "are in". Thanks, I fixed this and some other typos in that commentary.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |