emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#25758: closed (Should zathura depend on zathura-pd


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#25758: closed (Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler?)
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:05:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:04:29 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line 
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25758,
regarding Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
25758: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25758
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler? Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:01:22 +0100
zathura is a document viewer:

        synopsis: Lightweight keyboard-driven PDF viewer
        description: Zathura is a customizable document viewer.  It provides a 
minimalistic interface and an interface that mainly focuses on keyboard 
interaction.

Meanwhile, when you only install zathura itself, it's not usable for any 
format. You have to install zathura-pdf-poppler in order to be able to open PDF 
files.

So, shouldn't zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler so that PDFs are viewable 
by default?

On IRC, we agreed that zathura should depend on zathura-pdf-poppler:

        <mekeor> i just installed 'zathura', a PDF viewer. it doesn't work. i 
get this error first: "could not open plugin directory". can anyone reproduce 
this?
        <mekeor> oh, i think i have to additionally install another package.
        <mekeor> zathura-pdf-poppler
        <lfam> mekeor: If that's the cause, we should fix it!
        <mekeor> lfam: yes, it was the cause.
        <mekeor> lfam: there are several different backends for zathura. it's 
imaginable that a person wants to install zathura without PDF support but only 
postscript support, isn't it?
        <lfam> mekeor: It's imaginable, but we generally intend to provide 
fully featured packages
        <Sleep_Walker> question is - is there anyone who would like to have 
zathura and not zathura-pdf-poppler?
        <Sleep_Walker> and I agree that it is unlikely
        <Sleep_Walker> that is moment where weaker dependency like 'recommends' 
would come handy

If you have a different opinion, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to send a 
patch next week which implements this dependency.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:04:29 +0100

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]