[debbugs-tracker] bug#29187: closed (flymake ruby and perl tests fail on rhel7.4)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 09 Nov 2017 20:21:26 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#29187: flymake ruby and perl tests fail on rhel7.4
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #29187,
regarding flymake ruby and perl tests fail on rhel7.4
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
29187: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29187
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> flymake ruby and perl tests fail on rhel7.4
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:44:38 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> Package: emacs
> Version: 26.0.90
>
> Hi,
>
> The flymake tests added in 58bb346 for Ruby and Perl fail on RHEL7.4.
> I guess it's again due to different versions of an external tool
> reporting errors/warnings differently.
>
> perl version: v5.16.3
> ruby version: 2.0.0p648
>
> Test perl-backend condition:
>     (ert-test-failed
>      ((should
>        (eq 'flymake-error
>            (face-at-point)))
>       :form
>       (eq flymake-error flymake-warning)
>       :value nil))
>    FAILED  4/8  perl-backend
>
> Test ruby-backend condition:
>     (ert-test-failed
>      ((should
>        (eq 'flymake-warning
>            (face-at-point)))
>       :form
>       (eq flymake-warning nil)
>       :value nil))
>    FAILED  6/8  ruby-backend
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#29187: flymake ruby and perl tests fail on rhel7.4
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 09 Nov 2017 20:21:26 +0000
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > João Távora wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. Hmmm, trying to decide if this should be done just for the tests
> >> or in the ruby backend in general. I lean towards your solution, since
> >> this is appars to be a ruby bug anyway. WDYT?
> >
> > I'd say just for ruby.
>
> I think you meant "just for the ruby tests", since that's what your
> patch contained, and that's what I just commited in
> 0da08f2f8ef1946978f0974e9e8cdb87fece018c, which also contains the perl
> fix.
>
> João
>
>
> --- End Message ---