--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/12] Add computational software and circuit simulators |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:33:25 +0300 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 |
Hello Guix,
This patch series adds:
* Computational software from
<http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page>
* Qucs and its dependencies for digital circuit simulation/optimisation
* Ngspice and Xyce(serial/parallel) circuit simulators
* Qucs-s, which is a GUI that utilises those 3 simulators.
Ngspice, normally includes a non-free component (cider), which I delete
with a snippet from source, and build without. I have clearly noted the
licenses of the rest of the source code, but I would like someone to
verify I am not missing anything.
Theodoros Foradis (12):
gnu: Add qucs-s.
gnu: Add qucs.
gnu: Add xyce-parallel.
gnu: Add xyce-serial.
gnu: Add ngspice.
gnu: Add asco.
gnu: Add freehdl.
gnu: Add adms.
gnu: Add meep.
gnu: Add mpb.
gnu: Add libctl.
gnu: Add harminv.
gnu/packages/engineering.scm | 677 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 676 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Theodoros Foradis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#27344] [PATCH v4 3/3] gnu: Add qucs-s. |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:54:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Theodoros,
Theodoros Foradis <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Theodoros Foradis <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (qucs-s): New variable.
>>
>> There seems to be a lot of duplication with ‘qucs’. Would it be
>> possible to inherit from qucs, thereby reusing its phases, and simply
>> provide any extra phase that’s needed?
>
> Some paths are different in those two packages. For example:
> Qucs:
>> (substitute* '("qucs/qucs/qucsdigi"
>> "qucs/qucs/qucsdigilib"
>> "qucs/qucs/qucsveri")
>
>> (wrap-program (string-append out "/bin/qucs")
>
> Qucs-s:
>> (substitute* '("qucs/qucsdigi"
>> "qucs/qucsdigilib"
>> "qucs/qucsveri")
>
>> (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
>> (file (string-append out "/bin/qucs-s"))
>> (qucs (assoc-ref inputs "qucs"))
>> (qucsator (string-append qucs "/bin/qucsator")))
>> (wrap-program file
>
> So qucs-s cannot inherit qucs, and this is why I dismissed that when I
> looked at it in the past.
>
> I think we could create a procedure, that takes the variables as
> arguments and returns a qucs package. So that qucs-s inherits the
> application of that procedure on different arguments.
>
> Is this preferable to having two different packages with some identical
> phases?
Well you’re right, there’s no great solution in this case.
Finally pushed as commit ef2c6b409568123e760a7dfa22d45fc09e713198.
We’re done! :-)
Thank you!
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---