[debbugs-tracker] bug#30001: closed (27.0.50; Outdated info on save-excursion in (info "(cl) Modify Macros"))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 06 Jan 2018 17:16:37 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#30001: 27.0.50; Outdated info on save-excursion in 
(info "(cl) Modify Macros")
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30001,
regarding 27.0.50; Outdated info on save-excursion in (info "(cl) Modify 
Macros")
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30001: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30001
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 27.0.50; Outdated info on save-excursion in (info "(cl) Modify Macros")
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 06 Jan 2018 13:29:57 +0800
>
>
>
>
> 'C-h S cl-letf' or (info "(cl) Modify Macros") has the following:
>
>   Note that `cl-letf' on `(point)' is not quite like a
>   `save-excursion', as the latter effectively saves a marker which
>   tracks insertions and deletions in the buffer.
>
> but 'save-excursion' is no longer saving marker since Emacs 25.1
> according to 'C-h f save-excursion'.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#30001: 27.0.50; Outdated info on save-excursion in (info "(cl) Modify Macros")
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 06 Jan 2018 17:16:37 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > From: Xu Chunyang <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 20:31:12 +0800
> > 
> > > save-excursion doesn't save the _mark_, but it still saves a _marker_
> > > that tracks point, as opposed to just the value of point at the moment
> > > of the call.
> > 
> > I see. Please close the bug report since it is simply my
> > misunderstanding. Thanks.
>
> Done.
>
>
> --- End Message ---