[debbugs-tracker] bug#30279: closed (Where is image-dired-thumb-job-limit?)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 03 Feb 2018 23:43:05 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#30279: Where is image-dired-thumb-job-limit?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30279,
regarding Where is image-dired-thumb-job-limit?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30279: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30279
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Where is image-dired-thumb-job-limit?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:16:06 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
>
>
> Noticed when reading NEWS.26 image-dired-thumb-job-limit is mentioned,
> but nowhere is defined.  Closest variable that can be found in image-dired
> is image-dired-queue-active-limit.  Should the former be replaced with latter?
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#30279: Where is image-dired-thumb-job-limit?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 03 Feb 2018 23:43:05 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
>
>
> >> Noticed when reading NEWS.26 image-dired-thumb-job-limit is mentioned,
> >> but nowhere is defined.  Closest variable that can be found in image-dired
> >> is image-dired-queue-active-limit.  Should the former be replaced with 
> >> latter?
> >
> > Since image-dired-queue-active-limit is not a defcustom, I'd say the
> > reference to it should be simply removed.
>
> I hesitated to remove it because it will help the users to know the source
> of a possible problem (e.g. concurrent processes taking too much CPU).
>
> > (But if you see this in NEWS.26, you are in the wrong branch to edit
> > that file.)
>
> I renamed it in the right branch.
>
>
> --- End Message ---