[debbugs-tracker] bug#30571: closed (URL vs Homepage in package headers)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:58:35 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#30571: [PATCH] Document that URL and Homepage package 
headers are interchangeable.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30571,
regarding URL vs Homepage in package headers
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30571: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30571
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> URL vs Homepage in package headers
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:48:01 +0000 (GMT)
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Alpine 2.21 (LFD 202 2017-01-01)
>
>
>
>
> The Emacs Lisp manual at 
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Simple-Packages.html#Simple-Packages
>  gives an example of a package library headers.  This example includes a URL 
> line.  Later, the reader is directed to 
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Library-Headers.html#Library-Headers
>  for more information about the available headers.  This second page makes no 
> mention of the URL line, and instead describes a Homepage line.
>
> Surveying the Emacs source code, it turns out that both URL and Homepage are 
> used, although Homepage is more popular.
>
> Should one of URL and Homepage be preferred to the other?  Are they aliases?  
> Is one of these a typo?
>
> --
> Peter Oliver
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#30571: [PATCH] Document that URL and Homepage package headers are interchangeable.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 10 Mar 2018 13:58:35 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > From: Peter Oliver <address@hidden>
> > Date: Tue,  6 Mar 2018 14:52:14 +0000
> > Cc: Peter Oliver <address@hidden>
> > 
> > * doc/lispref/tips.texi:
> > URL is an alias for Homepage.
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
>
> --- End Message ---