[debbugs-tracker] bug#30760: closed ('initrd-modules' check has false positives)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:43:01 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#30760: guix system init broken on non GuixSD
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30760,
regarding 'initrd-modules' check has false positives
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30760: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30760
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: guix system init broken on non GuixSD Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 18:35:30 +0100 User-agent: NeoMutt/20170912 (1.9.0)

`guix system init` seems to be broken for non GuixSD distirbutions:
When I tried it on openSUSE:

# guix system --no-bootloader init /Devel/git/guix-config/config.scm /mnt/mnt/
;;; note: source file /Devel/extra/gnu/packages/connman.scm
;;;       newer than compiled /root/.config/guix/latest/gnu/packages/connman.go
;;; note: source file /Devel/extra/gnu/packages/connman.scm
;;;       newer than compiled 
/usr/lib64/guile/2.2/site-ccache/gnu/packages/connman.go
;;; note: source file /Devel/extra/gnu/packages/connman.scm
;;;       newer than compiled 
/usr/lib64/guile/2.2/site-ccache/gnu/packages/connman.go
guix system: error: open-file: No such file or directory: 
"/run/booted-system/kernel/lib/modules/4.15.6-1-default/modules.alias"

4.15.6-1-default is version of my running kernel, but not defined as package - 
it is not expected to be used for guix call.

/run/booted-system/ is specific for GuixSD.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#30760: guix system init broken on non GuixSD
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:43:01 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
> > Nevertheless, the risk of false-positives obviously exists, hence the
> > need for an escape hatch.
> >
> > What about the attached patch?
>
> Pushed as 61b1dbbdcd87f6b37d6b87715a9a4da4e63485ab.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---