[debbugs-tracker] bug#30828: closed (Icedtea updates)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:56:39 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#30828] Icedtea updates
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30828,
regarding Icedtea updates
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30828: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30828
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Icedtea updates Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:34:59 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)

These patches update Icedtea 2 and 3 (Java 7 and 8, respectively).

Usually I push these without review after making sure they build, but I
noticed a lot of Java-related activity lately, so I'm sending them in
for review.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#30828] Icedtea updates Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:56:39 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 03:11:31PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > These patches update Icedtea 2 and 3 (Java 7 and 8, respectively).
> >
> > Usually I push these without review after making sure they build, but I
> > noticed a lot of Java-related activity lately, so I'm sending them in
> > for review.
> 
> LGTM.  I think as long as you've verified that some of the dependents
> build, it should be safe to push such simple updates regardless.

Alright :) Pushed 1d97d8ffd8531696b1a651419aa9e106b09bb615

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---