emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#29819: closed (gnu: virtuoso-ose: Enable fct, ispa


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#29819: closed (gnu: virtuoso-ose: Enable fct, isparql, and ods plugins.)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 20:34:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2018 22:32:44 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#29819] gnu: virtuoso-ose: Enable fct, isparql, and 
ods plugins.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #29819,
regarding gnu: virtuoso-ose: Enable fct, isparql, and ods plugins.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
29819: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29819
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: gnu: virtuoso-ose: Enable fct, isparql, and ods plugins. Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:13:45 +0100 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1
Dear Guix,

I'd like to squeeze the most performance out of virtuoso, as well as add
some of the VAD packages to extend its functionality.

I attached the patch, but I have a question about the -m64 flag.  My
impression is that this flag will force a 64-bit build.  Since only
64-bit architectures are supported for this package anyway, I think this
should be fine.  Now, my question is: Does this flag have any effect on
the build?

Thanks for your time!

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen

Attachment: 0001-gnu-virtuoso-ose-Enable-fct-isparql-and-ods-plugins.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#29819] gnu: virtuoso-ose: Enable fct, isparql, and ods plugins. Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 22:32:44 +0200 User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> So I guess we can close this one and wait for the next release to
>> re-evaluate whether we can build these extra plugins.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Sounds good.  I just wanted to make sure we weren’t forgetting about
> it.  :-)
>
> Ludo’.

Marked this as done as all *working* changes that I wanted to apply here
have been applied in another patch.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention!

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]