[debbugs-tracker] bug#31431: closed ([PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add pybind11.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2018 22:51:02 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#31431] [PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add pybind11.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31431,
regarding [PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add pybind11.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
31431: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31431
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add pybind11.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 12 May 2018 14:51:30 +0000
>
>
>
>
> pybind11 is a c++ library for python binding. I don't know if it's
> appropriate to put it in python.scm. I checked libffi, libffcall, swig,
> they all have their independent file, and all of them contains very few
> packages.
>
> Should I merge them into one file just named "ffi.scm"?
>
> fis (1):
>   gnu: Add pybind11.
>
>  gnu/packages/python.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> -- 
> 2.14.3
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#31431] [PATCH 0/1] gnu: Add pybind11.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 26 May 2018 22:51:02 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Fis Trivial <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > pybind11 is a c++ library for python binding. I don't know if it's
> > appropriate to put it in python.scm. I checked libffi, libffcall, swig,
> > they all have their independent file, and all of them contains very few
> > packages.
> >
> > Should I merge them into one file just named "ffi.scm"?
>
> I’ve now applied the patch as-is, but moving all these things to ffi.scm
> would make sense, yes.
>
> Thank you,
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---