emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#32439: closed (guix pull as root generates too man


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#32439: closed (guix pull as root generates too many errors.)
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:07:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:06:22 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#32439: guix pull as root generates too many errors.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32439,
regarding guix pull as root generates too many errors.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
32439: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32439
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: guix pull as root generates too many errors. Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:41:14 +0000
Version:
guix (GNU Guix) 06a45ad6c0655f76ba15c90c0bd35857b45a7d3e

Platform:
Fedora 27 x86-64

Running guix pull -l as root user generates many warnings and errors. I
attached the first 1000 lines of stderr logging in this mail.

Attachment: guix-log-head
Description: stderr log

Attachment: ATT00001.txt
Description: ATT00001.txt


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#32439: guix pull as root generates too many errors. Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:06:22 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 09:07:04PM +0000, fis trivial wrote:
> As root user, it's address@hidden Indeed, installing address@hidden from Guix 
> fixes
> the problem. Thanks for your insight. :)
 
Great!

By the way, Guix *does* work with Guile 2.0. The messages you saw should
not prevent using Guix. Guix was using Guile 2.0, which was finding some
pre-compiled Guile 2.2 objects. Guile 2.0 printed those messages to say
that it did not recognize the precompiled objects and had to recompile
them.

> I thought Guix is self-contained, so are you implying that Guix itself is not
> reproducible?  Is it reasonable to request making Guix self-contained?

Guix is not self-contained. Its dependencies are listed in the manual:

https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Requirements.html

As for whether or not it could or should be self-contained, answering
that is outside of my expertise.

I think there is no bug to fix here, right? Please re-open the bug if I
am wrong.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]