bug#40549: closed ([usability] revert last generation)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:49:13 +0200
with message-id <861r5z2px2.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#40549: [usability] revert last generation
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40549,
regarding [usability] revert last generation
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
40549: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40549
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [usability] revert last generation
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:23:52 +0200
>
>
>
>
> This could be nicer:
>
> I just installed something and want to revert this last generation, as seen in 
> `guix package -l`.
>
> Doing a single call like `guix package -S 17 -d 18`   does not work, and I'd 
> like it to work.
>
> What it does is that it notices I'm currently on generation 18 and thus it 
> can't delete that one. As such it just errors out and returns.
>
> What I expect to happen (regardless of order of arguments) is that it switches 
> to the 17th generation and then deletes generation 18.
>
> -- 
> Tom Zander
>
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#40549: [usability] revert last generation
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:49:13 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report.  Because you reported 2 issues:
>
>   a) one about the order of ’%actions’ processing
>   b) one about short-name with optional argument
>
> I prefer to close this bug and track the issues into 2 separated
> numbers, i.e.,
>
>   a) see #50472 <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/50472>
>   b) see #50473 <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/50473>
>
> because it eases the actionable steps to fix them.
>
>
> All the best,
> simon
>
>
> --- End Message ---