bug#64790: closed (30.0.50; bookmark-watch-bookmark-file type doesn't offer all choices)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:53:02 +0300
with message-id <83msziok3m.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#64790: 30.0.50; bookmark-watch-bookmark-file type 
doesn't offer all choices
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #64790,
regarding 30.0.50; bookmark-watch-bookmark-file type doesn't offer all choices
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
64790: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64790
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 30.0.50; bookmark-watch-bookmark-file type doesn't offer all choices
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 22 Jul 2023 07:33:32 -0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
>
>
>
>
> According to the docstring, bookmark-watch-bookmark-file might be
> 'silent.  But that choice isn't present if one uses Custom to customize
> it:
>
> emacs -Q
> (require 'bookmark)
> M-x customize-option RET bookmark-watch-bookmark-file
> The Custom buffer shows a toggle, for nil or t.
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#64790: 30.0.50; bookmark-watch-bookmark-file type doesn't offer all choices
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:53:02 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > Cc: 64790@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:46:38 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > 
> > > Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 07:33:32 -0300
> > > From: Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > According to the docstring, bookmark-watch-bookmark-file might be
> > > 'silent.  But that choice isn't present if one uses Custom to customize
> > > it:
> > > 
> > > emacs -Q
> > > (require 'bookmark)
> > > M-x customize-option RET bookmark-watch-bookmark-file
> > > The Custom buffer shows a toggle, for nil or t.
> > 
> > Thanks, should be fixed now on the emacs-29 release branch.
>
> No further comments, so I presume the bug was indeed solved, and I'm
> closing it.
>
>
> --- End Message ---