|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#65303: closed (emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction) |
Date: | Wed, 16 Aug 2023 05:19:01 +0000 |
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:18:43 -0700 with message-id <a1da1789-f6ac-48a1-4ae7-eba4cb64ffae@gmail.com> and subject line Re: bug#65303: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #65303, regarding emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 65303: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65303 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:28:20 +1200 I've found an inconsistency in the Introduction to eshell.texi. It specifies as part of
a search pattern for Word Document files that are 100k or larger and six
months or older the following footnoted pattern:
ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)
That nets me files bigger than 50k, not the 100k specified in the paragraph. Here'sa quick diff supplying a correction.
===== diff =====
diff --git a/doc/misc/eshell.texi b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
index b5311e63a56..26f282de69c 100644
--- a/doc/misc/eshell.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/eshell.texi
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Introduction
Any tool you use often deserves the time spent learning to master it.
@footnote{For the understandably curious, here is what that command
looks like: But don't let it fool you; once you know what's going on,
-it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+50aM+5)}.}
+it's easier than it looks: @code{ls -lt **/*.doc(Lk+100aM+5)}.}
@menu
* Contributors to Eshell:: People who have helped out!
===== end diff =====
Regards, brickviking
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#65303: emacs 29.1.50; Inconsistency in eshell.texi Introduction Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:18:43 -0700 On 8/15/2023 10:13 PM, Jim Porter wrote:Fixed in 21b2ecee661 on the release branch, and closing this bug.Scratch that. *Now* this bug is closed.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |