bug#66680: closed (PDF version of Elisp manual is missing section about 'rx' regexp format)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 15:28:49 +0200
with message-id <87il6yss4u.fsf@gmx.de>
and subject line Re: bug#66680: PDF version of Elisp manual is missing section 
about 'rx' regexp format
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66680,
regarding PDF version of Elisp manual is missing section about 'rx' regexp 
format
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66680: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66680
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: PDF version of Elisp manual is missing section about 'rx' regexp format Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:55:47 +0200

Hi

I noted this glitch since 28.x.  Still there in 29.x.

HTML version has the section on 'rx' regexps coding, but it is missing from the PDFs downloadable from the main site https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/emacs.html

All the best

--

Marco Antoniotti
Somewhere over the Rainbow

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#66680: PDF version of Elisp manual is missing section about 'rx' regexp format
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 22 Oct 2023 15:28:49 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> > I noted this glitch since 28.x.  Still there in 29.x.
> >
> > HTML version has the section on 'rx' regexps coding, but it is missing
> > from the PDFs downloadable from the main site
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/emacs.html
>
> The section about "Rx Notation" in doc/lispref/searching.texi is embedded with
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> @ifnottex
> @node Rx Notation
> @subsection The @code{rx} Structured Regexp Notation
> ...
> @end ifnottex
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> The commit message of ac1ad3e49abd, which brought it to the manual,
> claims
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>     The additions are excluded from the print version to avoid making it
>     thicker.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> So it isn't a bug. Closing.
>
> > All the best
>
> Best regards, Michael.
>
>
> --- End Message ---