--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
OpenBLAS ILP64 using `-ilp64` lib name suffix instead of the standard `64_` |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2023 17:55:35 +0200 |
The problem is as per official OpenBLAS docs
(https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/blob/c3f2a3c0ca8d4a3700f81f176dd3f1bc08cff3dd/docs/distributing.md?plain=1#L79)
that some applications expect a `libopenblas64_.so` name, but Guix
chooses it's custom `-ilp64`. This messes up with Julia for example. If
the suffix `-ilp64` is needed, there also needs to be a `64_`
suffix. Otherwise some apps inexplicably fail on a wrongly named file.
Maya
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#65761: OpenBLAS ILP64 using `-ilp64` lib name suffix instead of the standard `64_` |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Oct 2023 12:03:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi Maya,
Maya Tomasek <maya.tomasek@disroot.org> skribis:
> The problem is as per official OpenBLAS docs
> (https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/blob/c3f2a3c0ca8d4a3700f81f176dd3f1bc08cff3dd/docs/distributing.md?plain=1#L79)
> that some applications expect a `libopenblas64_.so` name, but Guix
> chooses it's custom `-ilp64`. This messes up with Julia for example. If
> the suffix `-ilp64` is needed, there also needs to be a `64_`
> suffix. Otherwise some apps inexplicably fail on a wrongly named file.
If I’m not mistaken, this was fixed by
a473d562ffdd745285fa6c82ba9a8d7e421e8bca (precisely while addressing an
issue with Julia).
I’m closing the issue but please reopen if I got it wrong!
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---